Skip to content

Rollup of 4 pull requests #94666

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

clarfonthey and others added 9 commits January 29, 2022 18:37
Testing leading `.` and `..` components were missing from the unix tests.
Add Result::{ok, err, and, or, unwrap_or} as const

Already opened tracking issue rust-lang#92384.

I don't think that this should actually cause any issues as long as the constness is unstable, but we may want to double-check that this doesn't get interpreted as a weird `Drop` bound even for non-const usages.
doc: `Iterator::partition` use partial type hints

Switch to partial type hints to indicate only the collection type is needed.
…-Simulacrum

rustbuild: support RelWithDebInfo for lld

r? `@alexcrichton`

LLVM has flags that control the level of debuginfo generated when building via rustbuild. Since LLD is built separately, it currently has no way of generating any debuginfo. This change re-uses the same flags as LLVM for LLD to ensure it has the same level of debuginfo generated as LLVM.
…lan-DPC

Unix path::absolute: Fix leading "." component

Testing leading `.` and `..` components were missing from the unix tests.

This PR adds them and fixes the leading `.` case. It also fixes the test cases so that they do an exact comparison.

This problem reported by `@axetroy`
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Mar 6, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 6, 2022

📌 Commit e12fba5 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 6, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 6, 2022

⌛ Testing commit e12fba5 with merge ea6f99db068baf4f0819d5b42ccbd3f880bb0b97...

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@bors r-

I have unapproved #92385, so I don't think we can do this, sorry for wasting time.. I have opened #94668

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 6, 2022
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@bors retry r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 6, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-i6lk6gl branch March 11, 2022 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants