Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Store liveness in interval sets for region inference #90637
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Store liveness in interval sets for region inference #90637
Changes from all commits
00c55a1
4abb328
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It could be nice to also have a couple tests for
SparseIntervalMatrix
, or theIntervalSet::union
function that it primarily relies on.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SparseIntervalMatrix doesn't really need tests IMO -- at least currently it's a pretty thin wrapper around IntervalSet so there's not much surface area to test.
IntervalSet::union I think currently doesn't really merit testing -- it's a tiny wrapper around inserting all the ranges from a different set -- so I'm inclined to leave it as-is for now. If it becomes hot in some future perf assessment we may wish to optimize it by interleaving range iteration from the current and the other set (similar to a merge sort's merge operation), but that seems likely to be an obvious "we should add tests" moment), and depending on implementation would likely expose easier knobs to test -- right now it would end up pretty opaque I suspect.