- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 13.9k
Bounce out the layout refactor from beta #46925
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    80280f1    to
    2eaec8b      
    Compare
  
    | I thought that @alexcrichton's PR #45905 conflicts with #45225, but it is not based on @eddyb's PR and landed in parallel with it, so it's probably a better idea to leave it in. | 
| r=me | 
This should make sure that they stay fixed.
2eaec8b    to
    d6a5946      
    Compare
  
    | This is a big beta change @bors r+ p=10 | 
| 📌 Commit d6a5946 has been approved by  | 
    
  bors 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Dec 22, 2017 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Bounce out the layout refactor from beta @eddyb's #45225 was supposed to get into get into 1.24, but due to an ordering mistake, it had snuck into 1.23. That wide-effect translation-changing PR had poked LLVM's weak corners and caused many regressions (3 of them have fixes I include here, but also #46897, #46845, #46449, #46371). I don't think it is a good idea to land it in the beta (1.23) because there are bound to be some regressions we didn't patch. Therefore, I am reverting it in time for stable, along with its related regression fixes. r? @michaelwoerister (I think)
| ☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis | 
| Thanks, folks! | 
  This was referenced Dec 29, 2017 
      
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
@eddyb's #45225 was supposed to get into get into 1.24, but due to an ordering mistake, it had snuck into 1.23.
That wide-effect translation-changing PR had poked LLVM's weak corners and caused many regressions (3 of them have fixes I include here, but also #46897, #46845, #46449, #46371). I don't think it is a good idea to land it in the beta (1.23) because there are bound to be some regressions we didn't patch.
Therefore, I am reverting it in time for stable, along with its related regression fixes.
r? @michaelwoerister (I think)