-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Fix duplicate display of error E0502 #45603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 3 commits
5086657
975ff7b
014e610
37f2382
cf10bcf
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -395,18 +395,33 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> CheckLoanCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { | |
assert!(self.bccx.region_scope_tree.scopes_intersect(old_loan.kill_scope, | ||
new_loan.kill_scope)); | ||
|
||
self.report_error_if_loan_conflicts_with_restriction( | ||
old_loan, new_loan, old_loan, new_loan) && | ||
self.report_error_if_loan_conflicts_with_restriction( | ||
new_loan, old_loan, old_loan, new_loan) | ||
let err_old_new = Result::err(self.report_error_if_loan_conflicts_with_restriction( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Instead of |
||
old_loan, new_loan, old_loan, new_loan | ||
)); | ||
let err_new_old = Result::err(self.report_error_if_loan_conflicts_with_restriction( | ||
new_loan, old_loan, old_loan, new_loan | ||
)); | ||
|
||
if let Some(mut err_old) = err_old_new { | ||
err_old.emit(); | ||
if let Some(mut err_new) = err_new_old { | ||
err_new.cancel(); | ||
} | ||
} else if let Some(mut err_new) = err_new_old { | ||
err_new.emit(); | ||
} else { | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This block of code can be made slightly more idiomatic in the following way: match (err_old_new, err_new_old) {
(Some(mut err), None) | (None, Some(mut err)) => err.emit(),
(Some(mut err_old), Some(mut err_new)) => {
err_old.emit();
err_new.cancel();
}
(None, None) => return true,
} This way the compiler will always check that all paths have been taken care of, and you can handle cases that are mutually exclusive but that require the same code only once. |
||
|
||
false | ||
} | ||
|
||
pub fn report_error_if_loan_conflicts_with_restriction(&self, | ||
loan1: &Loan<'tcx>, | ||
loan2: &Loan<'tcx>, | ||
old_loan: &Loan<'tcx>, | ||
new_loan: &Loan<'tcx>) | ||
-> bool { | ||
-> Result<(), DiagnosticBuilder<'a>> { | ||
//! Checks whether the restrictions introduced by `loan1` would | ||
//! prohibit `loan2`. Returns false if an error is reported. | ||
|
||
|
@@ -416,7 +431,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> CheckLoanCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { | |
loan2); | ||
|
||
if compatible_borrow_kinds(loan1.kind, loan2.kind) { | ||
return true; | ||
return Ok(()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
let loan2_base_path = owned_ptr_base_path_rc(&loan2.loan_path); | ||
|
@@ -520,11 +535,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> CheckLoanCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { | |
_ => { } | ||
} | ||
|
||
err.emit(); | ||
return false; | ||
return Err(err); | ||
} | ||
|
||
true | ||
Ok(()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn consume_common(&self, | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | ||
// Copyright 2017 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT | ||
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at | ||
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT. | ||
// | ||
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or | ||
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license | ||
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your | ||
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed | ||
// except according to those terms. | ||
|
||
fn do_something<T>(collection: &mut Vec<T>) { | ||
let _a = &collection; | ||
collection.swap(1, 2); //~ ERROR E0502 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could this be a |
||
} | ||
|
||
fn main() {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am a bit confused on why this actually fixes the error. Maybe this is not the right place to discuss since this was approved already, but shouldn't the old version of report_error_if_loan_conflicts_with_restriction return false if an error is emitted, and thus short-circuiting this && statement (so it is not called the second time)?
Maybe I am missing something here.
p.s. Also why does the the test mention "error: aborting due to 2 previous errors" ? Shouldn't there be only one error?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, I believe that was the original intent. I am not sure why short-circuiting wasn't happening.
I think that is because of the cancelled diagnostic, I didn't want to block this PR on that as it is a separate issue. Haven't checked wether there's an issue already, but if not I'll create one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The short-circuiting actually does happen as expected on the current compiler master branch, I am on 9c87aca. I just built it, ran the test from this PR and it passed (without any other changes from this PR). I even manually double-checked the output just to make sure it was executed. btw, tested only --stage 1.
Also the count is still wrong, even with the original && I still get "... 2 previous errors"