Skip to content

Remove deprecated collections crate. #45446

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 24, 2017

Conversation

leoyvens
Copy link
Contributor

The real collections was merged with alloc, this facade was introduced in this PR to give #[no_std] users time to adapt. This was done at least two cycles ago, now we can consider removing it for good.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@leoyvens
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @alexcrichton

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 22, 2017
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@leodasvacas Looks like Travis is failing here, which is probably because of this line. I think you should just be able to remove collections from there and this should work from there.

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 22, 2017
@leoyvens leoyvens force-pushed the remove-libcollections branch from bb9b1df to 170f63e Compare October 22, 2017 16:55
@leoyvens
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mark-Simulacrum Thanks, fixed it!

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

I think this is good to go, but I think we should at least get some signoff from the libs team.. @rust-lang/libs, thoughts? Feel free to run fcp if that's easier (I don't think I can start it).

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 22, 2017
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 23, 2017

📌 Commit 170f63e has been approved by alexcrichton

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 24, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 24, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 170f63e with merge c2799fc...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2017
Remove deprecated `collections` crate.

The real `collections` was merged with `alloc`, this facade was introduced [in this PR](#42720) to give `#[no_std]` users time to adapt. This was done at least two cycles ago, now we can consider removing it for good.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 24, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing c2799fc to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants