-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Make only rustc_trans depend on rustc_llvm #41565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1a24a59
Remove rustc_llvm dependency from rustc_metadata
8e4f315
Remove rustc_llvm dependency from librustc
e3f6e68
Remove (direct) rustc_llvm dependency from rustc_driver
acdeedc
Use AtomicBool instead of a 'static mut' for LLVM init posioning
04a16ff
Fix run-make/llvm-pass
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So @eddyb pointed this out to me -- I'm not sure if we should add a dependency on this. First off i'm not sure if there are technical implications, but also, it's not under the same license as rust (just MIT, not MIT/Apache2).
cc @brson @alexcrichton
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason I mentioned it, fwiw, was that we might have more uses for it.
OTOH, my initial suggestion for this PR was
Box<Deref<Target=[u8]>>
, soowning_ref
is potentially overkill (although I believe it is more efficient).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't imagine the license of owning_ref is any more of a problem than, say, LLVM or jemalloc being under a different license (jemalloc is even linked into user code, not just rustc) . But of course IANAL and this is a valid question to ask.
FWIW it wouldn't be hard to write something equivalent to
ErasedBoxRef
, especially if it doesn't need a safe general purpose interface. But, needless to say, it would be quite sad to keep duplicating functionality available crates.io.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rkruppe your argument re: LLVM etc makes sense to me. I'm curious to hear what @brson has to say since I consider him more the expert on this stuff than me. =)
(In general, though, I'm excited about gaining the ability to use external crates in the compiler.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, @alexcrichton tells me that we have already whitelisted this, so it's all good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is fine to pull in owning_ref under MIT. We have historically accepted minor dependencies under permissive licenses including MIT and BSD, as these are maximally compatible with Rust's other licenses.
There's a tidy check that tries to keep our licenses in order but it may have some gaps yet.
Thanks for pinging me @nikomatsakis