Skip to content

Conversation

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@alexcrichton alexcrichton commented Jul 14, 2016

If no NOTE assertions are present I believe they aren't asserted at all, and it
looks like the number of NOTEs differs on distcheck vs make check, so let's
just remove them all.

Closes #34822

If no NOTE assertions are present I believe they aren't asserted at all, and it
looks like the number of NOTEs differs on distcheck vs `make check`, so let's
just remove them all.

Closes rust-lang#18154
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @brson

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned brson and unassigned aturon Jul 14, 2016
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jul 14, 2016

@bors r+ rollup p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 14, 2016

📌 Commit b2d1f7e has been approved by brson

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: rollup-

(looks like rollup + p=1 demotes it to the end of the queue)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 14, 2016

⌛ Testing commit b2d1f7e with merge 78d49bf...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
test: Remove NOTE assertions from trace_macros-gate

If no NOTE assertions are present I believe they aren't asserted at all, and it
looks like the number of NOTEs differs on distcheck vs `make check`, so let's
just remove them all.

Closes #18154
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #18154

Wait, it doesn't close #18154, it you probably meant something else.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Holy cow, that's a serious case of a stale clipboard, thanks @petrochenkov! I'll reopen the issue if this merges and for posterity the actual issue is #34822

@bors bors merged commit b2d1f7e into rust-lang:master Jul 14, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the fix-nightlies branch August 26, 2016 18:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants