[EXPERIMENT] How much perf is there to win in translation?#152363
[EXPERIMENT] How much perf is there to win in translation?#152363JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[EXPERIMENT] How much perf is there to win in translation?
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #152358) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (d6d8da7): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 3.5%, secondary 4.4%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 2.8%, secondary 5.2%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 473.129s -> 475.728s (0.55%) |
No description provided.