-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment #139178
Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment #139178
Conversation
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
|
93e3458
to
ebca98f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for all of the reviews @cjgillot!
r=me tomorrow
Thanks for doing this, and sorry I never got to do it myself. |
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#139178 (Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment) - rust-lang#139184 (Add unstable `--print=crate-root-lint-levels`) - rust-lang#139215 (Add `opt-level = "s"` for more std symbolication crates) - rust-lang#139232 (Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 5.) - rust-lang#139239 (Remove `aux_build` run-make rustc helpers) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139178 - apiraino:remove-cjgillot-automated-assighment, r=cjgillot Remove cjgillot from automated review assignment As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Review.20for.20.23137465/with/508540539). To be clear, this is not a value judgement, it's just a way to improve our fairness when assigning reviews, trying to find a balance between leaving time to Rust contributors review on their terms and availability and avoid having PRs waiting for too long. > [!IMPORTANT] > This is not a final decision! Rust contributors are free to re-add themselves back to the active review rotation (if they feel like it) once they have more availability. cc: `@cjgillot`
As discussed on Zulip.
To be clear, this is not a value judgement, it's just a way to improve our fairness when assigning reviews, trying to find a balance between leaving time to Rust contributors review on their terms and availability and avoid having PRs waiting for too long.
Important
This is not a final decision! Rust contributors are free to re-add themselves back to the active review rotation (if they feel like it) once they have more availability.
cc: @cjgillot