Add a per-item query just for define_opaque attributes

[oli-obk]

follow up to #128440 (comment)

This wasn't done in the previous PR to make sure we can gauge the perf effect independently of the other changes

[rustbot]

r? @petrochenkov

rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[oli-obk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit fe58a05 with merge 6bf40d9...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 6bf40d9 (6bf40d92f0985ed0954059e0dcfa3d220f802df7)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (6bf40d9): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.1%, 0.6%]	34
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[0.1%, 0.6%]	34

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.1%, secondary 3.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.1%	[0.6%, 1.6%]	5
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[2.1%, 4.9%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.1%	[0.6%, 1.6%]	5

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 775.364s -> 773.892s (-0.19%)
Artifact size: 365.01 MiB -> 365.02 MiB (0.00%)

[oli-obk]

cc @lcnr ^ moving it into the OwnerInfo is not feasible at present