Skip to content

Conversation

chenyukang
Copy link
Member

Fixes #89640

r? @Nilstrieb

I met the same issue, then found out this old issue :)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 4, 2023
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is:
image

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this isn't exactly great but I guess it's okay. I think finding such invalid tokens should actually be a fatal error, but I'm not sure about that. Maybe try putting up a PR that makes source files must contain UTF-8 encoded text, unexpected null bytes might occur when a different encoding is used errors fatal and see what wg-diagnostics thinks?

@chenyukang chenyukang force-pushed the yukang-fix-89640-space branch from 6484899 to b344bfa Compare July 4, 2023 02:18
Copy link
Member

@Noratrieb Noratrieb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me after fixing formatting

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this isn't exactly great but I guess it's okay. I think finding such invalid tokens should actually be a fatal error, but I'm not sure about that. Maybe try putting up a PR that makes source files must contain UTF-8 encoded text, unexpected null bytes might occur when a different encoding is used errors fatal and see what wg-diagnostics thinks?

@chenyukang chenyukang force-pushed the yukang-fix-89640-space branch from d3fa2fa to 799d291 Compare July 4, 2023 10:13
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ofc, the let-chain in diagnostics.rs is not formatted quite right (body indented by 8 spaces, && indented by 2) but since rustfmt can't handle them yet it's fine. We're gonna have to format-the-world anyways once it does.

@chenyukang
Copy link
Member Author

Ofc, the let-chain in diagnostics.rs is not formatted quite right (body indented by 8 spaces, && indented by 2) but since rustfmt can't handle them yet it's fine. We're gonna have to format-the-world anyways once it does.

yes, I was always mad with format when using let-chains,
seems we already have a draft style for it: #110568

@chenyukang
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=Nilstrieb

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 4, 2023

📌 Commit 799d291 has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 4, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 4, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 799d291 with merge 4dbc7e3...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
…=Nilstrieb

Detect extra space in keyword for better hint

Fixes rust-lang#89640

r? `@Nilstrieb`

I met the same issue, then found out this old issue :)
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 4, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nilstrieb
Pushing 4dbc7e3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 4, 2023
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

Thank you GitHub for closing this PR!

@chenyukang
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you GitHub for closing this PR!

What happened? Seems it is a Github bug ....

@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Jul 4, 2023

Last time this happened to one of my PRs it got merged in the end with a one hour delay...

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4dbc7e3): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.7% [2.7%, 2.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 654.344s -> 653.659s (-0.10%)

@chenyukang
Copy link
Member Author

Last time this happened to one of my PRs it got merged in the end with a one hour delay...

Github says this PR has conflicts:
image

While I checked there is no conflict...

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

I'll just close the PR manually. The commit is on master, GitHub is just confused. Everything is fine.

@Noratrieb Noratrieb closed this Jul 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggest joining two identifiers if the grammer is invalid and they would form a keyword
6 participants