Skip to content

Rollup of 4 pull requests #109803

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #109803

merged 8 commits into from
Mar 31, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

veera-sivarajan and others added 8 commits March 25, 2023 11:41
Currently, to know what the function will return when the pattern
doesn't match, the docs require the reader to understand the
implementation detail and mentally evaluate or run the example
code. It is not immediately clear.

This PR makes it more explicit so the reader can quickly find the
information.
…=thomcc

Improve documentation for str::replace() and str::replacen()

Currently, to know what the function will return when the pattern doesn't match, the docs require the reader to understand the implementation detail and mentally evaluate or run the example code. It is not immediately clear.

This PR makes it more explicit so the reader can quickly find the information.
…leLapkin

Update gccjit and remove libc 0.1 dependency

Fixes rust-lang#109774.
Refactor glibc time64 support, riscv32 always has 64-bit `time_t`

Refactor existing support for 64-bit `time_t` on 32-bit glibc platforms, as riscv32 `time_t` is 64-bit by default. Split out of rust-lang#109773.
…r=scottmcm

add comment to `impl !Error for &str`

I saw this impl in the [standard library docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/error/trait.Error.html#impl-Error-for-%26str) and wondered why it's needed. This commit adds a comment to explain its existence.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Mar 31, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 31, 2023

📌 Commit ec276c7 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 31, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 31, 2023

⌛ Testing commit ec276c7 with merge ec7bb8d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 31, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing ec7bb8d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 31, 2023
@bors bors merged commit ec7bb8d into rust-lang:master Mar 31, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 31, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#109793 0dfac2cff7cb2843d1a4f4c1bf3ea14804cfbb28
#109784 487771bf2aaff0fa5267a40c2a7d76c740493662
#109779 b97c4086e637c91f0589b3a8e6f5f7216c88d8dd
#109598 3474ef809a19c75761f6f5874a2bc1450e2234d9

previous master: eb3e9c1f45

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ec7bb8d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.1% [-3.1%, -3.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-2.7%, -1.7%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.1% [-3.1%, -3.1%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-mojot7k branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants