Rename thread_local_initializer_can_be_made_const to missing_const_for_thread_local

[alex-semenyuk]

Close #12934
As discussed at #12934 name thread_local_initializer_can_be_made_const sounds against convention for other lints which describe the issue/wrong code but not suggestion and it is quite long. The new name take example from existing lint missing_const_for_fn

changelog: thread_local_initializer_can_be_made_const : Rename to [missing_const_for_thread_local]

[rustbot]

r? @Alexendoo

rustbot has assigned @Alexendoo.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[alex-semenyuk]

^^ @Alexendoo

[Alexendoo]

How about missing_const_for_thread_local? That it's a thread local is the important part of the name, I don't think we should abbreviate it

[bors]

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #13037) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

[rustbot]

There are merge commits (commits with multiple parents) in your changes. We have a no merge policy so these commits will need to be removed for this pull request to be merged.

You can start a rebase with the following commands:

$ # rebase
$ git pull --rebase https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy.git master
$ git push --force-with-lease

The following commits are merge commits:

• 885f97e
• c17321b
• 0aac16e

[alex-semenyuk]

@Alexendoo sounds good, renamed

[Alexendoo]

Great, thanks!

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 6621e6c has been approved by Alexendoo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 6621e6c with merge 8919357...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

[Alexendoo]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 6621e6c with merge 3ed690f...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Alexendoo
Pushing 3ed690f to master...