Skip to content

Conversation

@folkertdev
Copy link
Contributor

@folkertdev folkertdev commented Dec 8, 2025

@rustbot label +S-waiting-on-stabilization

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer S-waiting-on-stabilization Waiting for a stabilization PR to be merged in the main Rust repository labels Dec 8, 2025
Comment on lines +469 to +498
r[cfg.cfg_select]
### The `cfg_select` macro

The built-in `cfg_select` macro expands to the right-hand side of the first configuration predicate that evaluates to `true`.

For example:

```rust
cfg_select! {
unix => {
fn foo() { /* unix specific functionality */ }
}
target_pointer_width = "32" => {
fn foo() { /* non-unix, 32-bit functionality */ }
}
_ => {
fn foo() { /* fallback implementation */ }
}
}
```
The `cfg_select` macro can also be used in expression position:

```rust
let is_unix_str = cfg_select! {
unix => "unix",
_ => "not unix",
};
```

A `_` can be used to write a configuration predicate that always evaluates to `true`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the Reference PR. It'd be worth filling in the details you provided in rust-lang/rust#149783 (comment), e.g. with the grammar, the removal of one level of braces, the compile error on fallthrough, etc.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can discuss as well how the bodies of each branch must be able to parse.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer S-waiting-on-stabilization Waiting for a stabilization PR to be merged in the main Rust repository

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants