Skip to content

Conversation

tomassedovic
Copy link

Given that they can set pretty much all the other flags (including e.g. nominating an issue), adding/removing waiting-on-author fits in that workflow and so seems sensible to add.

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Author

I ran into this here: #587 (comment)

During an earlier Libs-API call the team asked the PR's author to provide a table that would show how the various integer and NonZero types interact. I relayed the message and Amanieu set waiting-for-author.

The author now provided that info so the next logical step is to nominate the issue (which I was able to do) and remove waiting-for-author (which I couldn't do).

It feels to me that if we're allowing non-libs people to nominate issues and similar, this isn't a step too far.

@tomassedovic tomassedovic force-pushed the waiting-on-author branch 2 times, most recently from 1e3f61c to c4c25e9 Compare August 22, 2025 15:26
Given that they can set pretty much all the other flags (including e.g.
nominating an issue) these are part of the regular issue/ACP workflow
and thus seem sensible to add.
@tomassedovic
Copy link
Author

Got a suggestion that enabling @rustbot ready etc. is better so here we go.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants