Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JTC] Rename open_loop_control parameter and slightly change its scope #1525

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Thieso
Copy link

@Thieso Thieso commented Feb 4, 2025

Resolves #1505

@Thieso Thieso changed the title [JTC]#1505 [JTC] Rename open_loop_control parameter and slightly change its scope #1505 Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your PR. However, we must not change the default behavior of existing setups. Your change would go into the stable jazzy release as well.

  1. please keep the old open_loop parameter and add a deprecation warning if it is set to the non-default value (true)
  2. if open_loop is set to true, we still should deactivate the use_closed_loop_pid_adapter_ and override the setting of interpolate_from_desired_state
  3. Mark deprecated code clearly, so we can remove that in the release after next.
  4. Please add a migration note and release note here.

@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich changed the title [JTC] Rename open_loop_control parameter and slightly change its scope #1505 [JTC] Rename open_loop_control parameter and slightly change its scope Feb 4, 2025
@Thieso
Copy link
Author

Thieso commented Feb 7, 2025

Thanks for the comments. This should be better now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[JTC] Parameter open_loop_control should be the default
2 participants