Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add more docs #65

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

chore: add more docs #65

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

facundomedica
Copy link
Contributor

@facundomedica facundomedica commented Feb 21, 2025

Overview

(I gave the Execution API ADR to AI to write this for me)

Closes #11

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced documentation comments for the Executor interface, providing detailed descriptions of methods related to blockchain initialization, transaction retrieval, execution, and block finalization. These updates improve clarity and understanding of the system's operational flow.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the documentation for the Executor interface in execution.go. The changes expand comments for methods such as InitChain, GetTxs, ExecuteTxs, and SetFinal to provide clearer, more detailed descriptions of their parameters, return values, and roles within Rollkit. No changes were made to the method signatures or overall functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
execution.go Enhanced documentation for the Executor interface: updated method comments for InitChain, GetTxs, ExecuteTxs, and SetFinal for clarity.

Possibly related PRs

  • test: enhance DummyExecutor #39: The changes in the main PR enhance the documentation for the GetTxs, ExecuteTxs, and SetFinal methods in the Executor interface, while the retrieved PR modifies the implementations of GetTxs, ExecuteTxs, and SetFinal in the DummyExecutor, indicating a direct relationship between the two.

Poem

Hoppity hops, I’ve spruced up the docs today,
With clearer notes to show the way.
Each method now sings a tale so clear,
Guiding the blockchain without fear.
I, the clever rabbit, rejoice in pure code cheer! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4353a2 and 4ffc174.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • execution.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • execution.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RollkitBot RollkitBot requested review from a team, tzdybal, yarikbratashchuk and gupadhyaya and removed request for a team February 21, 2025 09:33
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
execution.go (3)

14-18: Consider enhancing method documentation with standard Go doc conventions.

While the documentation is clear and informative, consider adding:

  • Error conditions that might be returned
  • Standard Go doc parameter and return value annotations for better IDE integration

Example enhancement:

 // InitChain initializes a new blockchain with the given genesis parameters.
 // It returns the initial state root hash and maximum allowed transaction bytes.
-// - genesisTime: The official starting time of the blockchain
-// - initialHeight: The starting block height
-// - chainID: Unique identifier for the blockchain
+//
+// Parameters:
+//   - genesisTime: The official starting time of the blockchain
+//   - initialHeight: The starting block height
+//   - chainID: Unique identifier for the blockchain
+//
+// Returns:
+//   - stateRoot: The initial state root hash
+//   - maxBytes: Maximum allowed transaction bytes
+//   - err: Returns error if initialization fails due to invalid parameters or internal errors

21-22: Consider adding more details about transaction retrieval behavior.

The documentation could be enhanced with information about:

  • How transactions are ordered when retrieved
  • Whether transactions are removed from the mempool
  • Any size limits or other constraints

Example enhancement:

 // GetTxs retrieves pending transactions from the execution client's mempool.
-// These transactions are candidates for inclusion in the next block.
+// These transactions are candidates for inclusion in the next block.
+// Transactions are typically ordered by gas price (highest first) and nonce.
+// Note: This does not remove transactions from the mempool.

33-34: Consider adding error conditions and operational impact.

The documentation could be enhanced with:

  • Error conditions (e.g., what happens if the block doesn't exist)
  • Impact on dependent operations (e.g., can transactions still reference this block?)

Example enhancement:

 // SetFinal marks a block as finalized at the specified height.
-// This indicates the block can no longer be reverted.
+// This indicates the block can no longer be reverted.
+// Returns an error if the block at the specified height doesn't exist
+// or if the height is invalid (e.g., greater than current height).
+// Once finalized, all dependent operations are also considered final.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a7ddd0 and d4353a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • execution.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
execution.go (1)

10-12: Well-structured interface documentation!

The documentation effectively communicates the purpose of the interface and its architectural benefits in terms of separation of concerns and modularity.

@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 25, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0f31609 Feb 25, 2025
11 checks passed
@Manav-Aggarwal Manav-Aggarwal deleted the facu/moredoc branch February 25, 2025 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Write comprehensive go-doc
3 participants