Update main.yml #79
Update main.yml #79
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Richard Murillo <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)
35-35: Verify the intention behind OS matrix reduction
Let's verify if this change was discussed or documented elsewhere, as it represents a significant reduction in the CI coverage.
✅ Verification successful
OS matrix reduction appears intentional and safe
The change to limit CI to ubuntu-latest was explicitly documented in the PR description. The codebase analysis shows:
- The only Windows reference is in
ReferenceAssemblyCatalog.cs, which is about .NET Framework versioning documentation, not OS-specific functionality - No platform-specific build configurations or runtime identifiers were found in project files
- The codebase appears to be platform-agnostic .NET code that can run on any OS
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related discussions or documentation about removing Windows builds
gh pr view 79 --json body,comments --jq '.body, .comments[].body' | grep -i "windows"
# Check if there are any Windows-specific tests or configurations that might be affected
fd -e cs -e ps1 --exec rg -l "Windows|WindowsOnly|OS.IsWindows"
Length of output: 339
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the Windows-specific test file
cat ./tests/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers.Tests/Helpers/ReferenceAssemblyCatalog.cs
# Check if there are any Windows-specific build configurations or dependencies
rg -l "windows|Windows" .github/workflows/
# Look for platform-specific code or dependencies in project files
fd -e csproj -e props --exec rg -l "windows|Windows|RuntimeIdentifier"
Length of output: 3476
| @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| build: | |||
| strategy: | |||
| matrix: | |||
| os: [windows-latest, ubuntu-latest] | |||
| os: [ubuntu-latest] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Performance validation will be skipped
By removing windows-latest from the matrix and keeping only ubuntu-latest, the performance validation step (which requires Windows for ETL) will never execute. This could lead to undetected performance regressions.
Consider one of these solutions:
- Keep
windows-latestin the matrix if performance validation is required - Move performance validation to a separate workflow
- Implement an alternative performance validation approach that works on Linux
- os: [ubuntu-latest]
+ os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| os: [ubuntu-latest] | |
| os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest] |
Summary by CodeRabbit
ubuntu-latest, removing support forwindows-latest.