Skip to content

Conversation

@brandur
Copy link
Contributor

@brandur brandur commented Dec 9, 2025

I was working on another job output related change, found myself
becoming quite confused by the way it was implemented, and further found
that it doesn't have much in the way of testing through Output (only a
couple unit tests on JobRow) so it was hard to verify that what I was
changing was producing the expected result.

Here, add a "round trip" on job output for the client that records
output in a work function, then retrieves the row and checks Output on
it.

I was working on another job output related change, found myself
becoming quite confused by the way it was implemented, and further found
that it doesn't have much in the way of testing through `Output` (only a
couple unit tests on `JobRow`) so it was hard to verify that what I was
changing was producing the expected result.

Here, add a "round trip" on job output for the client that records
output in a work function, then retrieves the row and checks `Output` on
it.
@brandur brandur force-pushed the brandur-output-round-trip branch from f227731 to 3e06543 Compare December 9, 2025 15:15
@brandur brandur requested a review from bgentry December 9, 2025 15:31
@brandur brandur merged commit c649c73 into master Dec 10, 2025
14 checks passed
@brandur brandur deleted the brandur-output-round-trip branch December 10, 2025 12:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants