Skip to content

chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to v0.32.0 #803

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 6, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@vitest/coverage-c8 (source) 0.31.4 -> 0.32.0 age adoption passing confidence
vitest 0.31.4 -> 0.32.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest

v0.32.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Throw an error, if the module cannot be resolved  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3307 (1ad63)
    • Vitest used to fall back to the original import when it could not resolve it to the file path or the virtual module. This leads to hard-to-find module graph mismatches if you had incorrect alias or relied on relative imports to be resolved to the project root (which is usual behavior in TypeScript) because the code accidentally "worked". With this release, Vitest will now throw an error if it cannot resolve the module - there are possible edge cases that are not covered yet, so if you have any problems with this, please open a separate issue with reproduction.
  • Improve globs  -  by @​nickmccurdy in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3392 (19ecc)
    • Vitest now has glob patterns similar to Jest for better compatibility. It's possible that some files will be considered test files when previously they were not. For example, Vitest now considers test.js to be a test file. Also any file in __tests__ is now considered to be a test, not just files with test or spec suffix.
  • Add @vitest/coverage-v8 package  -  by @​AriPerkkio in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3339 (82112)
    • Vitest now uses v8 code coverage directly for better performance. @vitest/coverage-c8 is deprecated as Vitest no longer uses c8 package for coverage output. It will not be updated anymore, and Vitest will fail in the next version if the user has c8 as their coverage provider. Please, install the new @vitest/coverage-v8 package if you previously used @vitest/coverage-c8.
  • mocker: Don't restore mock to the original if the module is automocked  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3518 (c1004)
    • spy.mockRestore on auto-mocked named exports will no longer restore their implementation to the actual function. This behavior better matches what Jest does.
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jun 6, 2023
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jun 6, 2023

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.


  • Branch has one or more failed status checks

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 6, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: fa11db9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

💥 An error occurred when fetching the changed packages and changesets in this PR
Some errors occurred when validating the changesets config:
The package or glob expression "@react-docgen-internal/benchmark" is specified in the `ignore` option but it is not found in the project. You may have misspelled the package name or provided an invalid glob expression. Note that glob expressions must be defined according to https://www.npmjs.com/package/micromatch.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 6, 2023

Deploy Preview for react-docgen ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fa11db9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/react-docgen/deploys/64807ec917ce5e0008c0716f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-803--react-docgen.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from 547333d to d55dc2f Compare June 7, 2023 04:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from d55dc2f to d38c0d1 Compare June 7, 2023 10:40
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jun 7, 2023

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@danez danez merged commit 909eb57 into main Jun 7, 2023
@danez danez deleted the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch June 7, 2023 13:02
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant