Python Concurrency: asyncio, threading, and multiprocessing

This guide provides an overview of three common concurrency approaches in Python: asyncio, threading, and multiprocessing. Each has its own strengths depending on the type of task (I/O-bound or CPU-bound) and the level of concurrency required.

1. Python asyncio

• Purpose: asyncio is designed for writing asynchronous (non-blocking) code to handle I/O-bound tasks like network requests, file operations, and database queries efficiently.

• Key Concept: Utilizes a single-threaded event loop to manage multiple tasks concurrently. It switches between tasks during idle periods, such as waiting for I/O.

• Usage: asyncio works with async and await keywords to define coroutines that can run asynchronously.

• Best Use: Suitable for I/O-bound tasks (e.g., web scraping, async HTTP requests) where you want to avoid blocking the main thread while waiting for external resources.

2. Python threading

• Purpose: threading allows for the execution of multiple tasks concurrently within the same process, with each task running in a separate thread.

• Key Concept: Multiple threads run in the same memory space, making communication between threads easy, but introducing the risk of race conditions due to shared resources.

• Global Interpreter Lock (GIL): Python’s GIL allows only one thread to execute at a time, limiting performance for CPU-bound tasks.

• Usage: Best used for I/O-bound tasks (e.g., network operations, file reading), where threads can be idle while waiting for I/O to complete.

• Best Use: Suitable for I/O-bound tasks, but less effective for CPU-bound tasks due to the GIL.

3. Python multiprocessing

• Purpose: The multiprocessing module creates multiple processes that run independently, allowing you to bypass Python’s GIL and fully utilize multiple CPU cores.

• Key Concept: Each process runs in its own memory space, avoiding the GIL and enabling true parallelism, especially for CPU-bound tasks like heavy computations.

• Usage: Has more overhead than threading, but is powerful for CPU-intensive operations where performance is critical.

• Best Use: Ideal for CPU-bound tasks like data analysis, image processing, and other computations that can benefit from parallelism across multiple cores.

---

Summary of Use Cases

• asyncio: Ideal for I/O-bound tasks that need to be performed concurrently without blocking the main thread (e.g., network requests, database operations).

• threading: Best for I/O-bound tasks where threads can wait for external input/output, but limited by Python's GIL for CPU-bound tasks.

• multiprocessing: Most effective for CPU-bound tasks that require true parallelism, allowing you to take advantage of multiple cores and improve performance.

---

Concurrency Model	I/O-bound Tasks	CPU-bound Tasks
asyncio	- Provides concurrency but not true parallelism.	- No true parallelism for CPU-bound tasks.
	- Multiple I/O tasks are handled by switching between them when one task is waiting for I/O.	- CPU-bound tasks will block the event loop.
	- Ideal for tasks like network calls, file I/O, etc.	- If a task is CPU-intensive, it will prevent other tasks from running.
threading	- Provides true parallelism for I/O-bound tasks.	- No true parallelism due to the GIL.
	- While one thread waits for I/O, other threads can perform tasks.	- Multiple CPU-bound threads will not improve performance because the GIL restricts execution to one thread at a time.
	- Threads can run independently when waiting for network or disk I/O.	- The task switches between threads, but no speed-up is gained for CPU-bound tasks.
multiprocessing	- Offers true parallelism since each process has its own memory space and Python interpreter.	- True parallelism for CPU-bound tasks as it bypasses the GIL, allowing multiple processes to run on separate CPU cores.
	- Suitable for I/O-bound tasks but less efficient than asyncio or threading due to process overhead.	- Ideal for CPU-bound tasks, as each process runs in its own memory space and can fully utilize multi-core CPUs.
	- Process-based parallelism incurs more overhead compared to threading due to memory duplication.	- Ideal for CPU-heavy computations like image processing, machine learning, or data analysis.

When to use which Concurrency Model

This table provides an overview of which concurrency model is designed for I/O-bound and CPU-bound tasks.

Concurrency Model	Designed For	I/O-bound Tasks	CPU-bound Tasks
asyncio	I/O-bound operations	- Highly efficient for managing multiple I/O-bound tasks, such as network calls, file I/O, etc.	- Not suitable for CPU-bound tasks as they block the event loop.
threading	I/O-bound operations with parallelism	- Suitable for I/O-bound tasks when true parallelism is needed. Threads can perform tasks while others wait for I/O.	- Inefficient for CPU-bound tasks due to the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) restricting parallel execution.
multiprocessing	CPU-bound operations	- Can handle I/O-bound tasks but has more overhead than asyncio or threading due to process creation.	- Designed for CPU-bound tasks, allowing parallel execution across multiple CPU cores, bypassing the GIL.

References

https://superfastpython.com/