Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more explanation on ACK delay and zero-length CID #125

Closed
mirjak opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Add more explanation on ACK delay and zero-length CID #125

mirjak opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mirjak
Copy link
Collaborator

mirjak commented Jul 7, 2022

Comment by @yfmascgy (on PR #103):
I think we expand this section a bit as we found getting the delay right was non-trivial. QUIC time-stamp would work for sure. But if one decides not to use QUIC timestamp, we probably want to explain what is needed to be done here.

@yfmascgy
Copy link
Contributor

yfmascgy commented Jul 8, 2022

I have submitted PR #131 for this one.

@qdeconinck
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as #125 got merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants