Skip to content

[ET-VK] benchmarking linear_qta8a_qga4w_qta8o #12007

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ahmtox
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmtox ahmtox commented Jun 26, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Context

In order to benchmark the linear_qta8a_qga4w_qta8o operator, this diff adds functionality for int32 in the operator since Android does not support int8 operations. Functionally, this change should not be used, and this is only being provided in order to add support for int32 in android cases.

Changes

Created a new benchmarking file for the linear_qta8a_qga4w_qta8o operator, which tests against various test cases. Also made a few changes to the existing operator with support for int32 along with a new variant.

Differential Revision: D77384894

# Context
In order to benchmark the linear_qta8a_qga4w_qta8o operator, this diff adds functionality for int32 in the operator since Android does not support int8 operations. Functionally, this change should not be used, and this is only being provided in order to add support for int32 in android cases.

# Changes
Created a new benchmarking file for the linear_qta8a_qga4w_qta8o operator, which tests against various test cases. Also made a few changes to the existing operator with support for int32 along with a new variant.

Differential Revision: [D77384894](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D77384894/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 26, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/12007

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ No Failures

As of commit 9b79f85 with merge base 85cf6ce (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 26, 2025
ahmtox pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
# Context
In order to benchmark the linear_qta8a_qga4w_qta8o operator, this diff adds functionality for int32 in the operator since Android does not support int8 operations. Functionally, this change should not be used, and this is only being provided in order to add support for int32 in android cases.

# Changes
Created a new benchmarking file for the linear_qta8a_qga4w_qta8o operator, which tests against various test cases. Also made a few changes to the existing operator with support for int32 along with a new variant.

Differential Revision: [D77384894](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D77384894/)

ghstack-source-id: 292886977
Pull Request resolved: #12007
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D77384894

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@ahmtox ahmtox closed this Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants