-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 600
[ET-VK] Use shared pointer for vTensorStorage #11487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…stdout logging Pull Request resolved: #11452 ## Changes Some changes to `vulkan_compute_api_test`: * Remove `conv2d_prepack_test`. D74523774 / #11306 recently changed the conv2d prepack shader to use push constants, and since this test uses the "old" vulkan compute API (which doesn't support push constants) the test broke. Operator tests at this point are handled by `compute_graph_op_tests` anyway so just remove this test. * Make it so that verbose logging in `test_to_copy` only occurs in `VULKAN_DEBUG` is defined * Disable `test_etvk_copy_channel_offset_node*` tests, as these tests fail on some platforms (i.e. devGPU, windows, mac) likely due to an error in the implementation of the op. ghstack-source-id: 289110007 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D76156109](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76156109/)
Pull Request resolved: #11400 ## Changes * In `vTensor`, store the `storage_` member using a shared pointer instead of a direct `vTensorStorage` object * Remove the ability to construct a tensor view with a buffer offset ## Motivation > * In `vTensor`, store the `storage_` member using a shared pointer instead of a direct `vTensorStorage` object Previously, to support the ability to create tensor views I implemented copy constructors for `VulkanImage`, `VulkanBuffer`, and `vTensorStorage`. The idea was that the copied object instance would have the same handles as the original, but would not own the handle (and therefore not be responsible for destroying it). However, the problem with this approach is that in order to construct pipeline barriers and image layout transitions properly, we must know the details of how a resource was last accessed. Since tensor views make copies, accessing the original tensor will not update the access information of any copies it may have. Therefore, if the copy is then accessed, the last access information it stores would then be out of date. I originally tried to solve this problem with crude assumptions in the `transition()` function, but unfortunately the solution was not robust enough. I discovered validation errors such as ``` [ RUN ] VulkanComputeGraphOpsTest.test_transpose_with_mm VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 307231540 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197 ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x124ffb34 | vkCmdPipelineBarrier(): pImageMemoryBarriers[2].image (VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[]) cannot transition the layout of aspect=1, level=0, layer=0 from VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL when the previous known layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL. The Vulkan spec states: If srcQueueFamilyIndex and dstQueueFamilyIndex define a queue family ownership transfer or oldLayout and newLayout define an image layout transition, oldLayout must be VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED or the current layout of the image subresources affected by the barrier (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197) Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 1303270965 - Validation Error: [ UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x4dae5635 | vkQueueSubmit(): pSubmits[0].pCommandBuffers[0] command buffer VkCommandBuffer 0x21eba07e160[] expects VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[] (subresource: aspectMask VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT array layer 0, mip level 0) to be in layout VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL--instead, current layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL. Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 307231540 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197 ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x124ffb34 | vkCmdPipelineBarrier(): pImageMemoryBarriers[2].image (VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[]) cannot transition the layout of aspect=1, level=0, layer=0 from VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL when the previous known layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL. The Vulkan spec states: If srcQueueFamilyIndex and dstQueueFamilyIndex define a queue family ownership transfer or oldLayout and newLayout define an image layout transition, oldLayout must be VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED or the current layout of the image subresources affected by the barrier (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197) Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 1303270965 - Validation Error: [ UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x4dae5635 | vkQueueSubmit(): pSubmits[0].pCommandBuffers[0] command buffer VkCommandBuffer 0x21eba07e160[] expects VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[] (subresource: aspectMask VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT array layer 0, mip level 0) to be in layout VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL--instead, current layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL. Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 307231540 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197 ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x124ffb34 | vkCmdPipelineBarrier(): pImageMemoryBarriers[2].image (VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[]) cannot transition the layout of aspect=1, level=0, layer=0 from VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL when the previous known layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL. The Vulkan spec states: If srcQueueFamilyIndex and dstQueueFamilyIndex define a queue family ownership transfer or oldLayout and newLayout define an image layout transition, oldLayout must be VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED or the current layout of the image subresources affected by the barrier (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197) Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 1303270965 - Validation Error: [ UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x4dae5635 | vkQueueSubmit(): pSubmits[0].pCommandBuffers[0] command buffer VkCommandBuffer 0x21eba07e160[] expects VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[] (subresource: aspectMask VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT array layer 0, mip level 0) to be in layout VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL--instead, current layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL. Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 307231540 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197 ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x124ffb34 | vkCmdPipelineBarrier(): pImageMemoryBarriers[2].image (VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[]) cannot transition the layout of aspect=1, level=0, layer=0 from VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL when the previous known layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL. The Vulkan spec states: If srcQueueFamilyIndex and dstQueueFamilyIndex define a queue family ownership transfer or oldLayout and newLayout define an image layout transition, oldLayout must be VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED or the current layout of the image subresources affected by the barrier (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197) Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 1303270965 - Validation Error: [ UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x4dae5635 | vkQueueSubmit(): pSubmits[0].pCommandBuffers[0] command buffer VkCommandBuffer 0x21eba07e160[] expects VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[] (subresource: aspectMask VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT array layer 0, mip level 0) to be in layout VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL--instead, current layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL. Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 307231540 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197 ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x124ffb34 | vkCmdPipelineBarrier(): pImageMemoryBarriers[2].image (VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[]) cannot transition the layout of aspect=1, level=0, layer=0 from VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL when the previous known layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL. The Vulkan spec states: If srcQueueFamilyIndex and dstQueueFamilyIndex define a queue family ownership transfer or oldLayout and newLayout define an image layout transition, oldLayout must be VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED or the current layout of the image subresources affected by the barrier (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkImageMemoryBarrier-oldLayout-01197) Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: 1303270965 - Validation Error: [ UNASSIGNED-CoreValidation-DrawState-InvalidImageLayout ] Object 0: handle = 0x21eba07e160, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; Object 1: handle = 0x35643f0000000111, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_IMAGE; | MessageID = 0x4dae5635 | vkQueueSubmit(): pSubmits[0].pCommandBuffers[0] command buffer VkCommandBuffer 0x21eba07e160[] expects VkImage 0x35643f0000000111[] (subresource: aspectMask VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT array layer 0, mip level 0) to be in layout VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_GENERAL--instead, current layout is VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_SHADER_READ_ONLY_OPTIMAL. Objects: 2 [0] 0x21eba07e160, type: 6, name: NULL [1] 0x35643f0000000111, type: 10, name: NULL [ OK ] VulkanComputeGraphOpsTest.test_transpose_with_mm (26 ms) ``` when using tensor views. The simplest solution is to use a shared pointer to store the tensor storage object, that way tensor views can point to the same underlying object instance, and last access metadata will be consistent among all tensor views. > * Remove the ability to construct a tensor view with a buffer offset Removed this because it turns out that buffer properties cannot have arbitrary offsets; there are restrictions for what offsets can be used. The validation errors say it all: ``` [ RUN ] VulkanComputeGraphTest.test_simple_graph_with_view VUID-VkWriteDescriptorSet-descriptorType-00328(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: -368569266 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkWriteDescriptorSet-descriptorType-00328 ] | MessageID = 0xea08144e | vkUpdateDescriptorSets(): pDescriptorWrites[1].pBufferInfo[0].offset (84) must be a multiple of device limit minStorageBufferOffsetAlignment 16 when descriptor type is VK_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_STORAGE_BUFFER. The Vulkan spec states: If descriptorType is VK_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_STORAGE_BUFFER or VK_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_STORAGE_BUFFER_DYNAMIC, the offset member of each element of pBufferInfo must be a multiple of VkPhysicalDeviceLimits::minStorageBufferOffsetAlignment (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkWriteDescriptorSet-descriptorType-00328) VUID-VkDescriptorBufferInfo-range-00342(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: -371195848 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkDescriptorBufferInfo-range-00342 ] Object 0: handle = 0xee647e0000000009, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_BUFFER; | MessageID = 0xe9e00038 | vkUpdateDescriptorSets(): pDescriptorWrites[1].pBufferInfo[0].range (224) is larger than buffer size (224) + offset (84). The Vulkan spec states: If range is not equal to VK_WHOLE_SIZE, range must be less than or equal to the size of buffer minus offset (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkDescriptorBufferInfo-range-00342) Objects: 1 [0] 0xee647e0000000009, type: 9, name: NULL VUID-VkBufferMemoryBarrier-size-01189(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: -1238074894 - Validation Error: [ VUID-VkBufferMemoryBarrier-size-01189 ] Object 0: handle = 0x25d7d900870, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_COMMAND_BUFFER; | MessageID = 0xb63479f2 | vkCmdPipelineBarrier(): pBufferMemoryBarriers[0].size VkBuffer 0xee647e0000000009[] has offset 0x54 and size 0xe0 whose sum is greater than total size 0xe0. The Vulkan spec states: If size is not equal to VK_WHOLE_SIZE, size must be less than or equal to than the size of buffer minus offset (https://vulkan.lunarg.com/doc/view/1.3.296.0/windows/1.3-extensions/vkspec.html#VUID-VkBufferMemoryBarrier-size-01189) Objects: 1 [0] 0x25d7d900870, type: 6, name: NULL [ OK ] VulkanComputeGraphTest.test_simple_graph_with_view (8 ms) ``` ## Impact * Heap allocation upon tensor construction * Increased pointer chasing when accessing `vTensor` members I will validate that the impact of this change does not regress load/inference latency. ghstack-source-id: 289110003 Differential Revision: [D76047204](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76047204/)
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11487
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit 5100451 with merge base ef1d2ff ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
SS-JIA
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #11400 by @SS-JIA
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/236/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/236/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/238/orig
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/236/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge