Skip to content

Conversation

@yangdanny97
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds support for the Pyrefly type checker. Still in alpha so there are definitely gaps, but hopefully this provides some transparency on our progress so far :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@erictraut erictraut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this! LGTM

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
conformant = "Fail"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe change this from "Fail" to "Unsupported" for consistency?

@srittau srittau added the topic: conformance tests Issues with the conformance test suite label Aug 31, 2025
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
conformance_automated = "Fail"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like there's one last file that's missing a conformant entry.

@erictraut erictraut merged commit f2f4c40 into python:main Aug 31, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic: conformance tests Issues with the conformance test suite

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants