Skip to content

Lint Doc/ with Ruff #111192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Lint Doc/ with Ruff #111192

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Oct 22, 2023

This is with the default checks. Not too many changes needed!

What do you think, is that okay or should we specify some?


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--111192.org.readthedocs.build/

Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM, I'm in favour. As with #110917, though, I think maybe we should hold off here until we've posted on Discourse to check that others are okay with having more lints in CPython's CI. (I haven't got round to doing that post yet.) It's possible this and #110917 could be disruptive to people's workflows if they aren't familiar with ruff and/or pre-commit, so it would be good to give people a chance to voice their objections before going ahead with this. I'm in the pro-linter camp, but different people have different opinions on the usefulness of linters

@hugovk
Copy link
Member Author

hugovk commented Jul 19, 2024

Superseded by #122018.

@hugovk hugovk closed this Jul 19, 2024
@hugovk hugovk deleted the ruff-doc branch July 19, 2024 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants