-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
Optimize matmuls involving block diagonal matrices #1493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
9ad9540
ffb71d3
c5137d7
3b66eba
09bddf1
17fbeb3
7cef064
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -29,9 +29,11 @@ | |
cast, | ||
constant, | ||
get_underlying_scalar_constant_value, | ||
join, | ||
moveaxis, | ||
ones_like, | ||
register_infer_shape, | ||
split, | ||
switch, | ||
zeros_like, | ||
) | ||
|
@@ -99,6 +101,7 @@ | |
) | ||
from pytensor.tensor.rewriting.elemwise import apply_local_dimshuffle_lift | ||
from pytensor.tensor.shape import Shape, Shape_i | ||
from pytensor.tensor.slinalg import BlockDiagonal | ||
from pytensor.tensor.subtensor import Subtensor | ||
from pytensor.tensor.type import ( | ||
complex_dtypes, | ||
|
@@ -167,6 +170,77 @@ | |
return [constant_zero] | ||
|
||
|
||
@register_stabilize | ||
@node_rewriter([Blockwise]) | ||
def local_block_diag_dot_to_dot_block_diag(fgraph, node): | ||
r""" | ||
Perform the rewrite ``dot(block_diag(A, B), C) -> concat(dot(A, C), dot(B, C))`` | ||
|
||
BlockDiag results in the creation of a matrix of shape ``(n1 * n2, m1 * m2)``. Because dot has complexity | ||
of approximately O(n^3), it's always better to perform two dot products on the smaller matrices, rather than | ||
a single dot on the larger matrix. | ||
""" | ||
if not isinstance(node.op.core_op, BlockDiagonal): | ||
return | ||
|
||
def check_for_block_diag(x): | ||
return x.owner and ( | ||
isinstance(x.owner.op, BlockDiagonal) | ||
or isinstance(x.owner.op, Blockwise) | ||
and isinstance(x.owner.op.core_op, BlockDiagonal) | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Check that the BlockDiagonal is an input to a Dot node: | ||
for client in get_clients_at_depth(fgraph, node, depth=1): | ||
if not isinstance(client.op, Dot): | ||
continue | ||
|
||
op = client.op | ||
x, y = client.inputs | ||
|
||
if not (check_for_block_diag(x) or check_for_block_diag(y)): | ||
continue | ||
|
||
# Case 1: Only one input is BlockDiagonal. In this case, multiply all components of the block-diagonal with the | ||
# non-block diagonal, and return a new block diagonal | ||
if check_for_block_diag(x) and not check_for_block_diag(y): | ||
components = x.owner.inputs | ||
y_splits = split( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Isn't this and the join along the 0th axis assuming a BlockwiseBlockDiagonal without batch dims? Also not sure why you look for Dot but not Blockwise of _matrix_matrix_matmul. It doesn't always get rewritten as a Dot. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess because you don't look for batch dot you can only have a BlockDiagonal without batch dims. That's fine but maybe a bit implicit. You can also wait for the useless BlockwiseBlockdiagonal to be rewritten as BlockDiagonal and only track that. More importantly because you track a regular dot and not the matmul you may have a vector * matrix or matrix * vector product. Does the rewrite handle these correctly? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If this is what's implied it's not on purpose. I'll modify it to account for blockwise dot. There's no canonical There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm simplifying every blockwise as blockwise 2x2 dot (ie matmul) in #1471 The dot22 and dot22scalar are stuff from the blas pipeline and I've been hesitant to touch it. As first steps I would like to move them after specialize and to get rid of dot22scalar (should just be gemm). Those blas stuff should also work with blockwise but they currently don't. Anyway if you target blockwise and core 2x2dot in this PR that should be the most robust going forward even if it misses some cases now. I suggest you explicitly exclude the vector matrix dots for now. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. skipping matrix-vector is a bit of a bummer There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. then make sure the rewrite works or wait for the PR There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. you're like the teacher from that movie about jazz drumming u-u There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. which movie? whiplash? |
||
y, | ||
splits_size=[component.shape[-1] for component in components], | ||
n_splits=len(components), | ||
) | ||
new_components = [ | ||
op(component, y_split) | ||
for component, y_split in zip(components, y_splits) | ||
] | ||
new_output = join(0, *new_components) | ||
|
||
elif not check_for_block_diag(x) and check_for_block_diag(y): | ||
components = y.owner.inputs | ||
x_splits = split( | ||
x, | ||
splits_size=[component.shape[0] for component in components], | ||
n_splits=len(components), | ||
axis=1, | ||
) | ||
|
||
new_components = [ | ||
op(x_split, component) | ||
for component, x_split in zip(components, x_splits) | ||
] | ||
new_output = join(1, *new_components) | ||
|
||
# Case 2: Both inputs are BlockDiagonal. Do nothing | ||
else: | ||
# TODO: If shapes are statically known and all components have equal shapes, we could rewrite | ||
# this case to block_diag(*[dot(comp_1, comp_2) for comp_1, comp_2 in zip(x.owner.inputs, y.owner.inputs)]) | ||
continue | ||
|
||
copy_stack_trace(node.outputs[0], new_output) | ||
return {client.outputs[0]: new_output} | ||
|
||
|
||
@register_canonicalize | ||
@node_rewriter([DimShuffle]) | ||
def local_lift_transpose_through_dot(fgraph, node): | ||
|
@@ -2496,7 +2570,6 @@ | |
name="add_canonizer_group", | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
||
register_canonicalize(local_add_canonizer, "shape_unsafe", name="local_add_canonizer") | ||
|
||
|
||
|
@@ -3619,7 +3692,6 @@ | |
) | ||
register_stabilize(logdiffexp_to_log1mexpdiff, name="logdiffexp_to_log1mexpdiff") | ||
|
||
|
||
# log(sigmoid(x) / (1 - sigmoid(x))) -> x | ||
# i.e logit(sigmoid(x)) -> x | ||
local_logit_sigmoid = PatternNodeRewriter( | ||
|
@@ -3633,7 +3705,6 @@ | |
register_canonicalize(local_logit_sigmoid) | ||
register_specialize(local_logit_sigmoid) | ||
|
||
|
||
# sigmoid(log(x / (1-x)) -> x | ||
# i.e., sigmoid(logit(x)) -> x | ||
local_sigmoid_logit = PatternNodeRewriter( | ||
|
@@ -3674,7 +3745,6 @@ | |
|
||
register_specialize(local_polygamma_to_tri_gamma) | ||
|
||
|
||
local_log_kv = PatternNodeRewriter( | ||
# Rewrite log(kv(v, x)) = log(kve(v, x) * exp(-x)) -> log(kve(v, x)) - x | ||
# During stabilize -x is converted to -1.0 * x | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.