Create 2024_Parasayan_LateNeoFrance_collectiveburial.janno

[wolfgangaroo]

.janno file for future use.

Parasayan et al.	Sci Adv	Late Neolithic collective burial reveals admixture dynamics during the third millennium BCE and the shaping of the European genome	2024	https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adl2468

[stschiff]

Excellent, thanks for submitting @wolfgangaroo! We'll take a look.

[nevrome]

Thanks for preparing this .janno file! I see the following issues

• The package name does not follow our expected standard of Year_AuthorName_RelevantKeyword. I propose to shorten it to 2024_Parasayan_LateNeoFrance.
• Please remove all columns that are completely empty/filled only with n/a.
• About the incomplete radiocarbon date: The supplementary text (p.9) says

MS radiocarbon-dating of the SMGB burial yielded 3800±30 BP, calibrated via IntCal2020 (130).to 2410-2129 cal BCE 97.8%).

Date_C14_Uncal_BP and Date_C14_Uncal_BP_Err can therefore imho be set to 3800 and 30. When I calibrate this with currycarbon I get this output distribution, which fits fairly well to the 2339BC to 2139BC age range the authors report in the supplementary tables and the main text (if we ignore the first little peak currycarbon includes in the 95% range).

CalEXPR: [1] 1:3800±30BP
Calibrated: 2394BC >> 2286BC > 2236BC < 2150BC << 2137BC
1-sigma: 2286-2243BC, 2237-2199BC, 2162-2150BC
2-sigma: 2394-2391BC, 2389-2389BC, 2342-2137BC
                               ▁▁▁   ▁
                              ▁▒▒▒▁ ▁▒▁▁▁     ▁
                              ▒▒▒▒▒▁▒▒▒▒▒    ▁▒
                             ▁▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒   ▁▒▒▁
                        ▁    ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▁ ▁▒▒▒▒
                ▁      ▁▒▁▁▁▁▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▁▒▒▒▒▒▁
        ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒▁▁▁▁▁▁▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
 -2460 ┄───────┬────────────┬───────────┬────────────┬────────┄ -2030
                >            >      ^         < <
                             ────────────    ──
                ──    ───────────────────────────

Maybe you could quickly have a look 👍.

[stschiff]

@wolfgangaroo did you have a look at these issues above? Also, do you happen to know the first author of this paper, and could ask him for genotype data? Importantly, we would like author-made genotype data, not the one from AADR. Thanks.

[stschiff]

I think we may need to re-assign this. I will take over authorship for now.