uri: Use the “includes credentials” rule for WhatWg user/password getters #20303
+52
−8
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thinking about #20208 (comment) this change seems to be most in line with the current semantics of distinguishing between
nulland""for WHATWG. If we decide that null doesn't make sense for WHATWG, we can still change this, but for now this seems to be an actual bug fix.The URL serializing algorithm from the WHATWG URL Standard uses an “includes credentials” rule to decide whether or not to include the
@in the output, indicating the presence of a userinfo component in RFC 3986 terminology. Use this rule to determine whether or not an empty username or password should be returned as the empty string (present but empty) or NULL (not present).