Skip to content

DOC: Update link to pytz documentation #61821

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

star1327p
Copy link
Contributor

Pytz documentation:
https://pypi.org/project/pytz/

The original link does not work:
http://pytz.sourceforge.net/index.html

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

@@ -2541,7 +2541,7 @@ Fold is supported only for constructing from naive ``datetime.datetime``
or for constructing from components (see below). Only ``dateutil`` timezones are supported
(see `dateutil documentation <https://dateutil.readthedocs.io/en/stable/tz.html#dateutil.tz.enfold>`__
for ``dateutil`` methods that deal with ambiguous datetimes) as ``pytz``
timezones do not support fold (see `pytz documentation <http://pytz.sourceforge.net/index.html>`__
timezones do not support fold (see `pytz documentation <https://pypi.org/project/pytz/>`__
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use https://pythonhosted.org/pytz/ instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mroeschke Done. Thank you for the suggestion!

@mroeschke mroeschke added the Docs label Jul 10, 2025
@WhiteW00lf
Copy link

@star1327p Can I take this ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants