-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node: Re-create the lockfiles for the project-with-lockfile
test projects
#9449
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9449 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 67.97% 67.93% -0.04%
+ Complexity 1291 1289 -2
============================================
Files 249 249
Lines 8792 8792
Branches 913 913
============================================
- Hits 5976 5973 -3
- Misses 2431 2433 +2
- Partials 385 386 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
adac09b
to
567e8e1
Compare
definitionFile, | ||
custom = mapOf("<REPLACE_LOCKFILE_NAME>" to "package-lock.json") | ||
) | ||
patchActualResult(result.toYaml()) should matchExpectedResult(expectedResultFile, definitionFile) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this have gone to a separate commit? In any case, please explain in the commit message why replacing REPLACE_LOCKFILE_NAME
can be omitted now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
... and why the REPLACE_LOCKFILE_NAME
replacement is kept for another place in this file in the next commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
... and why the
REPLACE_LOCKFILE_NAME
replacement is kept for another place in this file in the next commit.
I explained it for this
commit, but not for the next one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...the reason why it's kept in the next one, is because the next
commit is unrelated to updating any lockfile or dependencies.
567e8e1
to
e055a54
Compare
e055a54
to
bdff1f9
Compare
Make the results easier to compare. The lockfiles have been created with `npm` 10.8.3, `pnpm` 9.9.0, `yarn` 1.22.19 and `yarn2` 3.2.1. Note: The replacement for `REPLACE_LOCKFILE_NAME` is no more necessary, because the issue which mentioned the lockfile name does no more happen with the updated dependencies. Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <[email protected]>
Remove the replacement analog to 1e58026 and dfaa896. Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <[email protected]>
bdff1f9
to
4295eb2
Compare
Merge regardless of the unrelated clearlydefined test failures. |
Make the results easy to compare.
Part of #9261.