Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: Fix two failing fun tests #8634

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2024
Merged

test: Fix two failing fun tests #8634

merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

fviernau
Copy link
Member

@fviernau fviernau commented May 8, 2024

No description provided.

@fviernau fviernau requested a review from a team as a code owner May 8, 2024 14:04
@fviernau fviernau enabled auto-merge (rebase) May 8, 2024 14:05
@fviernau fviernau mentioned this pull request May 8, 2024
1 task
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.98%. Comparing base (69e5491) to head (5ecf681).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #8634   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     67.97%   67.98%           
  Complexity     1005     1005           
=========================================
  Files           244      244           
  Lines          7844     7787   -57     
  Branches        876      876           
=========================================
- Hits           5332     5294   -38     
+ Misses         2129     2110   -19     
  Partials        383      383           
Flag Coverage Δ
funTest-non-docker 34.79% <ø> (+0.17%) ⬆️
test 37.84% <ø> (-0.10%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sschuberth
Copy link
Member

Can I push an update for OsvServiceFunTest as well to your branch @fviernau?

@fviernau
Copy link
Member Author

fviernau commented May 8, 2024

Can I push an update for OsvServiceFunTest as well to your branch @fviernau?

I've just read it after filing: #8635.

@sschuberth

This comment was marked as outdated.

@fviernau fviernau changed the title test(pub): Update the expected result test: Fix two failing fun tests May 8, 2024
@fviernau
Copy link
Member Author

fviernau commented May 8, 2024

As none of them will separately pass all tests, I'll merge both prematurely.

I meanwhile combined them in this PR.

@@ -25,10 +25,12 @@ import io.kotest.matchers.result.shouldBeSuccess
import io.kotest.matchers.shouldBe

import java.time.Instant
import kotlinx.serialization.encodeToString
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left-overs.

fviernau added 2 commits May 8, 2024 16:21
Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <[email protected]>
@fviernau fviernau merged commit f804dd0 into main May 8, 2024
21 checks passed
@fviernau fviernau deleted the pub-test-fun branch May 8, 2024 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants