-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 317
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(poetry): Improve the definition file paths #7624
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
.../package-managers/python/src/funTest/assets/projects/synthetic/poetry-expected-output.yml
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I propose
definitionFile.relativeTo(analysisRoot)
instead to avoid adding more code that relies on the project to be version controlled.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not introduce the requirement, because code which computes the value for
definitionFilePath
already relies on that prior to this change. Furthermore,relativeTo(analysisRoot)
seems wrong because the definition file path is not meant to be relative to the analysis root, but the repository root.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And I didn't say that. I was talking about adding more code with that requirement.
Indeed
Project.definitionFilePath
is documented like that 😞 IMO that's a mistake already, and it will make our lives harder in order to address #2896.Anyway, we already have a bunch of code like that, so we can bulk-address this later, I guess.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know, I didn't mean to say that you said that. I only intended to clarify that both, the old and the new code path depend on that same logic.