Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DNM] Revert symlink from cloned Zuul repo #2813

Closed

Conversation

jamepark4
Copy link
Contributor

Testing revert of f79ca6f

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign frenzyfriday for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@frenzyfriday
Copy link
Collaborator

frenzyfriday commented Mar 21, 2025

I am missing the context, sorry. Could you pls point me to the Jira/put some more details on why we are reverting?

@jamepark4
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am missing the context, sorry. Could you pls point me to the Jira/put some more details on why we are reverting?

I pinged you downstream with links to the logs but the recent change results in dlrn failing to clone the opendev repo to the local directory because the symlink has already populated that location.

@jamepark4
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing since #2818, is addressing this.

@jamepark4 jamepark4 closed this Mar 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants