-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
OCPBUGS-59757: OCPBUGS-59758: Improve MCN test stability #30018
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: release-4.19
Are you sure you want to change the base?
OCPBUGS-59757: OCPBUGS-59758: Improve MCN test stability #30018
Conversation
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.19-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.19-periodics-e2e-azure-mco-disruptive-techpreview periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.19-periodics-e2e-gcp-mco-disruptive-techpreview periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.19-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview |
@isabella-janssen: trigger 4 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/8f303eb0-6888-11f0-93ac-4d919f688b32-0 |
/cherry-pick jira OCPBUGS-59203 |
@isabella-janssen: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-59203 |
@isabella-janssen: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59203 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59757. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59757, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-57524 |
@isabella-janssen: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57524 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59758. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59758, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial |
@isabella-janssen: trigger 5 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/92b81070-6889-11f0-83f3-d2115506bc53-0 |
@isabella-janssen: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The diff looked a bit weird, but cross-comparing the two branches the content seem to align, so
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, yuqi-zhang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59758, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59757, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59757, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/hold Letting this sit for a bit longer since it is not super urgent & having more history on the success of the tests in 4.20 will build more confidence in the fix. |
This is a manual cherry-pick of #29981, since the automated cherry-pick never completed.
Work included:
OCPBUGS-59203
This updates the MCN happy scope path test,
Should properly update the MCN from the associated MCD
, to be a part of the serial test suite instead of the parallel test suite. This update is necessary since the test makes changes to MCN objects that can cause interference with other MCN tests when run in parallel.OCPBUGS-57524
This does two things to improve the stability of the slow, disruptive MCN tests
Should properly create and remove MCN on node creation and deletion
due to the newly provisioned node not becoming ready within two minutes.Should properly report MCN conditions on node degrade
test.Test locally:
To run the updated tests locally, run them against any 4.19 cluster with the following command.
Test with payload:
All MCN tests should consistently pass in the MCO disruptive test suite & default serial test suite.