Skip to content

OCPBUGS-54906: Change the test image to registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost #29672

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

chiragkyal
Copy link
Member

@chiragkyal chiragkyal commented Apr 10, 2025

The e2e tests are failing on AWS ARM64 platform.

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a/1909765152207540224

Failed to get endpoints for e2e-test-router-external-certificate-z6z2b/hello-openshift 

The failure is because openshift/hello-openshift is not a multi-arch image.

The pod log said

exec container process `/hello-openshift`: Exec format error

We need to switch to a test image that supports Multi-arch. registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost is one such image widely used.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 10, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@chiragkyal: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/e1ef54f0-1618-11f0-9e12-bee60632d77e-0

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from candita and knobunc April 10, 2025 14:34
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ipi-ovn-runc-techpreview

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 10, 2025

@chiragkyal: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ipi-ovn-runc-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/893933e0-1644-11f0-9d4e-96dea30b2cf8-0

Copy link
Member

@lunarwhite lunarwhite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

openshift-origin-29672-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a

Failing tests:

[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM][Skipped:Disconnected] OLMv1 operator installation should block cluster upgrades if an incompatible operator is installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM][Skipped:Disconnected] OLMv1 operator installation should fail to install a non-existing cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM][Skipped:Disconnected] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

openshift-origin-29672-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ipi-ovn-runc-techpreview

Failing tests:

[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM][Skipped:Disconnected] OLMv1 operator installation should block cluster upgrades if an incompatible operator is installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM][Skipped:Disconnected] OLMv1 operator installation should fail to install a non-existing cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM][Skipped:Disconnected] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift

Failing tests:

[sig-network] LoadBalancers [Feature:LoadBalancer] should be able to preserve UDP traffic when server pod cycles for a LoadBalancer service on the same nodes [Skipped:alibabacloud] [Skipped:aws] [Skipped:baremetal] [Skipped:external] [Skipped:ibmcloud] [Skipped:kubevirt] [Skipped:nutanix] [Skipped:openstack] [Skipped:ovirt] [Skipped:vsphere] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]

It seems that the issue of the openshift/hello-openshift image lacking multi-arch support would be resolved by this PR. (previous pod log)

@swghosh
Copy link
Member

swghosh commented Apr 11, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 11, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@chiragkyal chiragkyal changed the title Change the test image to registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost OCPBUGS-54906: Change the test image to registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost Apr 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@chiragkyal: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54906, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@chiragkyal: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54906, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lihongan

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from lihongan April 11, 2025 11:59
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@chiragkyal: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54906, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lihongan

In response to this:

The e2e tests are failing on AWS ARM64 platform.

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a/1909765152207540224

Failed to get endpoints for e2e-test-router-external-certificate-z6z2b/hello-openshift 

The failure is because openshift/hello-openshift is not a multi-arch image.

The pod log said

exec container process `/hello-openshift`: Exec format error

We need to switch to a test image that supports Multi-arch. registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost is one such image widely used.

/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 11, 2025
@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Apr 11, 2025

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chiragkyal, neisw, swghosh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD d97cda4 and 2 for PR HEAD adfb9ab in total

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 019c9bd and 1 for PR HEAD adfb9ab in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 54e75ac and 0 for PR HEAD adfb9ab in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision adfb9ab was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 13, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 14, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ed54e26 and 2 for PR HEAD adfb9ab in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 14, 2025

@chiragkyal: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout adfb9ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview adfb9ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-serial adfb9ab link false /test e2e-openstack-serial
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp adfb9ab link false /test okd-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade adfb9ab link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive adfb9ab link false /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial adfb9ab link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling adfb9ab link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial adfb9ab link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling adfb9ab link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway adfb9ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway
ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback adfb9ab link false /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling adfb9ab link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive adfb9ab link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn adfb9ab link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade adfb9ab link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 adfb9ab link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia adfb9ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling adfb9ab link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack adfb9ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 14, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: adfb9ab

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (12) are below the historical average (220): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (102) are below the historical average (1117): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-okd-e2e-gcp IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (15) are below the historical average (28): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

known regression

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 14, 2025

@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

known regression

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 787ed13 into openshift:main Apr 14, 2025
35 of 55 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@chiragkyal: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54906: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54906 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

The e2e tests are failing on AWS ARM64 platform.

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a/1909765152207540224

Failed to get endpoints for e2e-test-router-external-certificate-z6z2b/hello-openshift 

The failure is because openshift/hello-openshift is not a multi-arch image.

The pod log said

exec container process `/hello-openshift`: Exec format error

We need to switch to a test image that supports Multi-arch. registry.k8s.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost is one such image widely used.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@chiragkyal chiragkyal deleted the change-test-image branch April 14, 2025 11:53
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-tests
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-tests-container-v4.20.0-202504141309.p0.g787ed13.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants