[enterprise-4.19] OSDOCS-15477: add gwapi aws known issue

[jldohmann]

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15477

Link to docs preview: https://96578--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-19-release-notes.html#ocp-4-19-known-issues_release-notes (scroll a bit)

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: needs change management

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jldohmann: This pull request references OSDOCS-15477 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15477

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: needs change management

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jldohmann]

@lihongan could you PTAL at this docs PR for QE feedback? it adds the known issue about GWAPI and AWS private clusters. please lmk if there needs to be more information about the issue. thank you 🙇

[ahardin-rh]

LGTM!

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Tue Jul 29 22:54:17 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://96578--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-19-release-notes.html

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jldohmann: This pull request references OSDOCS-15477 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15477

Link to docs preview: https://96578--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-19-release-notes.html#ocp-4-19-known-issues_release-notes (scroll a bit)

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: needs change management

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jldohmann]

hi, i need the following acks from you all for change management purposes:
@Miciah
@CFields651
@mcurry-rh
@kalexand-rh
and Ashley (thanks! 😄 )

thank you all

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jldohmann: This pull request references OSDOCS-15477 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15477

Link to docs preview: https://96578--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-19-release-notes.html#ocp-4-19-known-issues_release-notes (scroll a bit)

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information: needs change management

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[michaelryanpeter]

/label merge-review-in-progress

[michaelryanpeter]

LGTM!

Since you are a merge reviewer and still getting change management acks, I am going to add the ok-to-merge label for you.

/label ok-to-merge
/remove-label mergre-review-needed
/remove-label merge-review-in-progress

[openshift-ci]

@michaelryanpeter: The label(s) /label ok-to-merge , /remove-label mergre-review-needed cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

LGTM!

Since you are a merge reviewer and still getting change management acks, I am going to add the ok-to-merge label for you.

/label ok-to-merge
/remove-label mergre-review-needed
/remove-label merge-review-in-progress

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[kalexand-rh]

From a CM perspective, LGTM, but I'm having trouble squaring up the relationship between the introduction to the UL and the UL contents.

[CFields651]

LGTM

[CFields651]

/label px-approved

[openshift-ci]

@jldohmann: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.