-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OSSM-9880 Update feature support table for 3.1 #96398
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OSSM-9880 Update feature support table for 3.1 #96398
Conversation
/label service-mesh |
🤖 Tue Jul 29 06:21:54 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
257772c
to
4a7cfc3
Compare
@shreyasiddhartha: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label merge-review-needed |
0340371
into
openshift:service-mesh-docs-main
/cherry-pick service-mesh-docs-3.1 |
@briandooley: new pull request created: #96780 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Change type: Doc update; Update feature support table for 3.1
Doc JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSSM-9880
Fix Version: service-mesh-docs-main and service-mesh-docs-3.1
Doc Preview: https://96398--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-service-mesh/latest/ossm-release-notes/ossm-release-notes-feature-support-tables.html
SME Review/QE Review: @longmuir @sridhargaddam @fjglira
Peer Review: @rh-tokeefe