s2i-dotnetcore: the upstream repo is removing architecture specific imagestream files. #355
Conversation
…magestream files. Since .NET 6 EOL, the image stream definitions are the same across available architectures.
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
needs-ok-to-test
|
Hi @tmds. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@aroyoredhat FYI |
|
/ok-to-test |
openshift-ci
bot
added
ok-to-test
|
@tmds: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm |
|
@fbm3307 I am not part of the OWNERS of this repo so you need to do the lgtm and approve |
|
@fbm3307 can you merge this? |
1 similar comment
|
@fbm3307 can you merge this? |
|
@dperaza4dustbit It seems @fbm3307 is Out of Office, can you approve this in the meantime? |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aroyoredhat, fbm3307, omajid, tmds The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
4 participants
Since .NET 6 EOL, the image stream definitions are the same across available architectures. The architecture specific ImageStream definition files are removed in redhat-developer/s2i-dotnetcore#518.
@fbm3307 ptal
cc @omajid