Skip to content

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-54947: Fix Load balancer IP setup #9659

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.18
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9144

/assign gpei

Fixing the issue where the load balancer IP was not set in the
range of the machine network CIDRs by setting it to the first
IP in the CIDR range.

Also extending this logic to non-existing vnet installs since
the problem can happen even during normal installs.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43724 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54947. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-54947: Fix Load balancer IP setup

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9144

/assign gpei

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-43724: Fix Load balancer IP setup [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-54947: Fix Load balancer IP setup Apr 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54947, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43724 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43724 targets the "4.19.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gpei

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9144

/assign gpei

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from gpei, jhixson74 and mtulio April 14, 2025 11:17
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 14, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 520b761 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack 520b761 link false /test e2e-azurestack
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network 520b761 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-static-ovn 520b761 link false /test e2e-vsphere-static-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jhixson74
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jhixson74

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 15, 2025
@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Apr 15, 2025

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 15, 2025
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 16, 2025
@jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants