-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
OCPBUGS-59290: Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18] #1362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: release-4.18
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-52853, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira cherry-pick release-4.18 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MarSik The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/retitle OCPBUGS-59290Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18] |
@MarSik: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retitle OCPBUGS-59290: Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18] |
@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59290, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59290, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retest |
/jira refresh |
@mrniranjan: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59290, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/test e2e-hypershift |
@MarSik: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
Replaces the failing cherry pick from #1358 (comment)