Skip to content

Conversation

bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor

The PR is for removing the GCPLabelsTags featuregate, which was introduced for managing the new features for configuring GCP Labels and Tags in Infrastructure API and referenced in o/operators and o/installer.

Featuregate references was removed in openshift operators and openshift installer in v4.18, and removing the featuregate definition in this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Hello @bharath-b-rh! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bharath-b-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55653, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gpei

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

The PR is for removing the GCPLabelsTags featuregate, which was introduced for managing the new features for configuring GCP Labels and Tags in Infrastructure API and referenced in o/operators and o/installer.

Featuregate references was removed in openshift operators and openshift installer in v4.18, and removing the featuregate definition in this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from gpei June 18, 2025 05:52
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 18, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and yuqi-zhang June 18, 2025 05:53
@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @barbacbd @JoelSpeed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from barbacbd June 18, 2025 05:53
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bharath-b-rh, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD cb94c55 and 2 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1c8afbd and 1 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1c8afbd and 2 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ef565c2 and 1 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD a8cbc21 and 0 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision 8fa54b5 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 20, 2025
@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

All the CI jobs are failing with same error with few operators like console, ingress reporting degraded status. I will check the failures in detail next Monday.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

There's a panic in Machine API Operator as it is still relying on the GCPLabelsTags feature gate

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JoelSpeed Thank you for pointing out the issue! It is also referenced in both machine-api-operator and installer-aro, which I wasn't aware of. Let me create a PR in both projects to remove the reference.

It has references in other projects like hypershift, library-go too but in the tests sample data. I think those can be updated by project owners when api package is updated.

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/testwith openshift/machine-api-operator#1385

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

2 similar comments
@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2cd5821 and 2 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

JoelSpeed commented Jul 8, 2025

/hold

GCP e2e looks in a bad way

Have we removed references to this feature gate from Machine API? Looking at the CAMGI on that run it looks like MAPI never stood up, so possibly there are still references?

Edit from Machine API Operator logs itself:

feature \"GCPLabelsTags\" is not registered in FeatureGates 

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 8, 2025
@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ci/prow/e2e-gcp wasn't triggered because it's not marked required, the last execution was before machine-api-operator changes were merged.

2025-06-20T20:23:54.365499375Z 	github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pkg/operator.(*Operator).maoConfigFromInfrastructure(0xc0007efc80)
2025-06-20T20:23:54.365499375Z 		/go/src/github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pkg/operator/operator.go:478 +0x7f0

Line No 478 had the feature gate reference earlier.

Triggering again to check this was the case.

/test e2e-gcp

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JoelSpeed ci/prow/e2e-gcp went through. I think it's ready to be merged.

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e0195b9 and 2 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 926605d and 1 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test verify-client-go

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 10, 2025

@bharath-b-rh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 8fa54b5 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure 8fa54b5 link false /test e2e-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 926605d and 2 for PR HEAD 8fa54b5 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 674ad74 into openshift:master Jul 10, 2025
24 of 26 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bharath-b-rh: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55653: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55653 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

The PR is for removing the GCPLabelsTags featuregate, which was introduced for managing the new features for configuring GCP Labels and Tags in Infrastructure API and referenced in o/operators and o/installer.

Featuregate references was removed in openshift operators and openshift installer in v4.18, and removing the featuregate definition in this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bharath-b-rh bharath-b-rh deleted the oape-232 branch July 10, 2025 08:52
@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-cluster-config-api
This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-api-container-v4.20.0-202507101546.p0.g674ad74.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants