Fix: Add test for keyword usage in method names (#426)

[lakshaybxt]

What's changed?

Added a test case to verify that method names using the this_ identifier are correctly handled without renaming.

What's your motivation?

This fixes issue #426 by ensuring methods with this_ in their name are not renamed incorrectly.

Anything in particular you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Please check if the test case covers all edge cases for keyword-like method names.

Anyone you would like to review specifically?

@openrewrite/reviewers @maintainers

Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?

An alternative was modifying the recipe logic, but adding a test case was a simpler and more effective solution.

Any additional context

This test ensures future changes do not introduce regressions.

Checklist

• I've added unit tests to cover both positive and negative cases
• I've read and applied the recipe conventions and best practices
• I've used the IntelliJ IDEA auto-formatter on affected files

[timtebeek]

Good to see the test added, thanks! Did you already explore how to fix the failing test?

[timtebeek]

Suggested change

	@Issue("https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis/issues/426") // Links to the issue being tested
	@Issue("https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis/issues/426")

[timtebeek]

Suggested change

// Language hint for syntax highlighting

[timtebeek]

We have a convention of only marking PRs ready for review when they are close to being merged. Since the implementation is missing we'll keep this as draft for now.

[lakshaybxt]

I fixed the changes, is the changes show in this pull request only or I have to raise a new one?

[greg-at-moderne]

I fixed the changes, is the changes show in this pull request only or I have to raise a new one?

No need to raise another one, but make sure to push your code changes to your branch (426-keyword-usage in your fork).
`

[lakshaybxt]

Thanks for the help, @greg-at-moderne! I've pushed it to my branch.

[timtebeek]

We're not yet seeing the fix you made on the branch underlying this pull request:
https://github.com/lakshaybxt/rewrite-static-analysis/tree/fix/426-keyword-usage

Note that we should be seeing your recipe code changes here before we can review:
https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis/pull/490/files

[lakshaybxt]

Sorry for the issue. Now I commit the fixes to my branch and I'm grateful for your help.
https://github.com/lakshaybxt/rewrite-static-analysis/blob/fix/426-keyword-usage/src/test/java/org/openrewrite/staticanalysis/MethodNameCasingTest.java

[timtebeek]

That's good ; now we see the changes to the test class reflected here. Did you already explore a fix to the recipe class itself? That would be necessary before we can merge.

[lakshaybxt]

I'm working on it and can you help me on this? Like what I have to do
It is showing this "Cannot find a Java installation on your machine (Windows 11 10.0 amd64) matching: {languageVersion=21, vendor=any vendor, implementation=vendor-specific}. Toolchain download repositories have not been configured.

Possible solutions:

• Install required toolchain
• Modify Daemon JVM criteria
  "
  

[greg-at-moderne]

If you don't have experience with Java development, IntelliJ, running tests, etc. I suggest you find some courses (or use materials from ChatGPT) to start with. And only then proceed to address an issue like this.
This way you can learn and gain new skills.

[timtebeek]

As to the IDE warnings above you'll want to go through these pages:

• https://docs.openrewrite.org/authoring-recipes/recipe-development-environment
• https://docs.openrewrite.org/reference/building-openrewrite-from-source

But indeed, if you're not yet comfortable developing, then it might help to try your hand at some easier projects first. Not meant to discourage, but we've known this project not to be easy for folks starting out, and have limited time to help you on your way.

[lakshaybxt]

Thanks for the advice I really appreciate it. I might need more hands-on practice on some basic projects as you suggested.