WG Update

[CharlotteTill]

feat: new WG pages
update: agenda docs & member logo
fix: updates for consistency
addresses issue #391

[alee]

Thanks Charlotte, this is a good start. A few issues:

Please remember to follow the conventional commits guidelines.

https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary

I'll amend your original commit before merging but it's a good habit to try and follow yourself.

Should we keep the "Friends of the ... Working Group" sections? It looks a little odd at the moment and doesn't have any content, we can always add it back in when there is content instead of having empty placeholders. Same goes for the Current Developments / Previous Projects sections which should be filled in or left out.

I tightened up the language on the working groups main page to remove some unnecessary redundancy, let me know what you think.

@cmbarton

[CharlotteTill]

Thank you Allen. I think the changes to the main page regarding WG language work well. I approve.
As for the sections within the individual WG sections - the section headers were suggested by members of the Certification group, and no feedback (positive or negative) was received by any other WG. For now, I agree that the 'Friends of the ... Working Group' header can likely be removed, at least for now. The current and previous projects headers seem very needed. Maybe I should add text under each to the effect of 'coming soon' thus allowing the main changes to go live, while each WG complies what they would like added to each section, the that content can be a future update - either by me, or by the individual WG rep who has taken on the role up page updates?

[alee]

thanks for setting this up Charlotte! I amended your first commit log message and made some minor updates for speling / typos