Skip to content

Conversation

satyenme
Copy link

@satyenme satyenme commented Aug 11, 2025

Backporting JDK-8336702: C2 compilation fails with "all memory state should have been processed" assert. Change adjusts condition for converting a LongCountedLoop into a loop nest to handle edge case compilation failure outlined in original PR. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local tier 1 and 2, and new test. Patch is clean.


Progress

  • JDK-8336702 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8336702: C2 compilation fails with "all memory state should have been processed" assert (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2074/head:pull/2074
$ git checkout pull/2074

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2074
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2074/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2074

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2074

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2074.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back ssubramaniam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 11, 2025

@satyenme This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8336702: C2 compilation fails with "all memory state should have been processed" assert

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 21 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport ecc77a5b4a84c84ffa1580174872af6df3a4f6ca 8336702: C2 compilation fails with "all memory state should have been processed" assert Aug 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 11, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Aug 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 11, 2025

⚠️ @satyenme This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 11, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 11, 2025

Webrevs

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

/approval request for backport of JDK-8336702: C2 compilation fails with "all memory state should have been processed" assert

Motivation: Without this change the provide test code will fail to compile - this happens when converting a LongCountedLoop into a loop nest. With the fix, the intended behavior should be preserved, and the provided test code (and similar cases) will compile without issue.

Risk: Medium-Low. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2 and new test. Touches C2 code, but change has been in tip since October 2024. Patch is clean.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 12, 2025

@satyenme
8336702: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Aug 12, 2025
@satyenme
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Going to push as commit e07ae66.
Since your change was applied there have been 26 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 13, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 13, 2025

@satyenme Pushed as commit e07ae66.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant