Skip to content

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Sep 19, 2025

I backport this for parity with 17.0.18-oracle


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8320836 needs maintainer approval

Warning

 ⚠️ Found leading lowercase letter in issue title for 8320836: jtreg gtest runs should limit heap size

Issue

  • JDK-8320836: jtreg gtest runs should limit heap size (Enhancement - P4 - Requested)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3965/head:pull/3965
$ git checkout pull/3965

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3965
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3965/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3965

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3965

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3965.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 19, 2025

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport ac9e51023fc34a82b795950a109af2397826adaa 8320836: jtreg gtest runs should limit heap size Sep 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Sep 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2025

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 19, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Sep 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant