Skip to content

Conversation

kurashige23
Copy link
Member

@kurashige23 kurashige23 commented Jun 30, 2025

Hi all,

This is a backport of JDK-8355249 : Remove the use of WMIC from the entire source code

JDK-8355249 is an enhancement, but the future removal of WMIC will affect any version of jdk, so I think it needs to be backported.

Original patch does not apply cleanly because JDK-8340311 is not backported to jdk17. For this reason, I modified Win8301247Test.java instead of WindowsHelper.java.
In addition, JDK-8344275 doesn't apply to 17, and NosuchElementException is only used in 17, so I made a slightly different fix for those as well.

I confirmed that Win8301247Test.java passes on Windows Server 2022.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8355249 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8355249: Remove the use of WMIC from the entire source code (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3688/head:pull/3688
$ git checkout pull/3688

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3688
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3688/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3688

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3688

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3688.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 30, 2025

👋 Welcome back tkurashige! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 30, 2025

@kurashige23 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8355249: Remove the use of WMIC from the entire source code

Reviewed-by: asemenyuk, phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c90978b: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite
  • f78f1bf: 8319174: Enhance robustness of some j.m.BigInteger constructors
  • 90b5b24: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 4458719a108f45d3744d47a6ea081fe9ec3e675e 8355249: Remove the use of WMIC from the entire source code Jun 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 30, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 30, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Webrevs

@kurashige23
Copy link
Member Author

@phohensee

Thank you for your review about jdk21 and jdk11.
Could you also review this PR?.

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

jpackage changes look good

@kurashige23
Copy link
Member Author

@phohensee

Thank you for your review about jdk21 and jdk11.
Could you also review this PR?.

Sorry for sudden mention. I would appreciate it if you could confirm it.

Copy link
Member

@phohensee phohensee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2025

⚠️ @kurashige23 This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@kurashige23
Copy link
Member Author

kurashige23 commented Jul 24, 2025

@GoeLin

Sorry for sudden mention. Could you add maintainer approval for JDK-8355249 please?

Oh, I forgot to issue approval request. I'm sorry, I issued it below.
I would appreciate it if you could check it. Thank you.

@kurashige23
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request Backporting this protects against the risk of future removal of WMIC.
Original patch does not apply cleanly because JDK-8340311 and JDK-8344275 are not backported to jdk17, and NosuchElementException is only used in 17, so I Fixed a part of the original patch.
This fix constists of makefile fix and test fix, low risk.
I confirmed that Win8301247Test.java passes on Windows Server 2022.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@kurashige23
8355249: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Jul 24, 2025
@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

Please enable Github Actions and let them run for a basic verification. Thanks.

@kurashige23
Copy link
Member Author

@RealCLanger

My apologies for forgetting to enable GHA.
I've enabled and run it.
There are 2 errors in linux-cross-compile. These errors are related to download issues and are not related to this PR.

Thanks.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Jul 30, 2025
@kurashige23
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for your review.

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jul 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

@kurashige23
Your change (at version de79559) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Going to push as commit 6a2ed7c.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c90978b: 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite
  • f78f1bf: 8319174: Enhance robustness of some j.m.BigInteger constructors
  • 90b5b24: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 30, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 30, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jul 30, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

@phohensee @kurashige23 Pushed as commit 6a2ed7c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants