Skip to content

8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool #3354

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dchuyko
Copy link
Member

@dchuyko dchuyko commented Mar 13, 2025

This a backport of JDK-8351933 [0] (PR [1]) for 17u. At one of code paths the TC subfield of ctl field is decremented and the result is not masked correctly. As a result, the FJP may stop executing tasks [2]. The target code is in awaitWork() instead of tryTrim() and the surrounding code is different from the current master, as well as the original mask name. The core change is the same, candidate for compareAndSetCtl() is constructed using '(c & RC_MASK) | ((c - TC_UNIT) & TC_MASK)' instead of '(UC_MASK & (c - TC_UNIT))' to correctly preserve the RC subfield.

[0] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351933
[1] openjdk/jdk#24034
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330017


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8351933 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3354/head:pull/3354
$ git checkout pull/3354

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3354
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3354/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3354

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3354

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3354.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 13, 2025

👋 Welcome back dchuyko! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 13, 2025

@dchuyko This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool

Reviewed-by: phh, dl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee, @DougLea) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport JDK-8351933 8351933: Inaccurate masking of TC subfield decrement in ForkJoinPool Mar 13, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 13, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with the original issue, but not the original commit. If you have the original commit hash, please update the pull request title with Backport <hash>.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 13, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 13, 2025

⚠️ @dchuyko This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@dchuyko
Copy link
Member Author

dchuyko commented Mar 19, 2025

/approval request This a tiny bugfix in ForkJoinPool. At one of code paths the TC subfield of ctl field is decremented and the result is not masked correctly, so the RC subfield is not preserved. That sometimes leads to a stopped pool in 17 and 11 [0].

Testing: full jtreg tier1-3 and JCK for multiple supported platforms in the internal Liberica CI.

[0] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330017

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@dchuyko
8351933: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Mar 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Apr 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@DougLea DougLea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this corrects in the same way as in other releases

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Apr 14, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 12, 2025

@dchuyko This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@dchuyko
Copy link
Member Author

dchuyko commented May 14, 2025

/keepalive

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 14, 2025

@dchuyko The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 11, 2025

@dchuyko This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Jun 16, 2025

Hi @dchuyko
Do you still want to bring this to 17? If so, please merge head for new testing.

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Jun 18, 2025

Removing label in the meantime.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Jun 18, 2025
@dchuyko
Copy link
Member Author

dchuyko commented Jun 19, 2025

Yes. Merged recent master.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Jun 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Jun 27, 2025
@dchuyko
Copy link
Member Author

dchuyko commented Jun 27, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jun 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@dchuyko
Your change (at version 09d4316) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Going to push as commit a897ee8.
Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jun 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@phohensee @dchuyko Pushed as commit a897ee8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants