Skip to content

8388838: RISC-V: vectorization tests failed when UseUnalignedAccesses is false - #32021

Open
kuaiwei wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:masterfrom
kuaiwei:riscv_vec_fail
Open

8388838: RISC-V: vectorization tests failed when UseUnalignedAccesses is false#32021
kuaiwei wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:masterfrom
kuaiwei:riscv_vec_fail

Conversation

@kuaiwei

@kuaiwei kuaiwei commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Some vectorization jtreg tests failed on riscv SG2044. The root cause is UseUnalignedAccesses is disable by default on this machine, so super word optimization is blocked in these tests. We need check this flag before testing.



Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

  • JDK-8388838: RISC-V: vectorization tests failed when UseUnalignedAccesses is false (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/32021/head:pull/32021
$ git checkout pull/32021

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/32021
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/32021/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 32021

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 32021

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32021.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper

bridgekeeper Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Welcome back kwei! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 23, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kuaiwei The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The total number of required reviews for this PR has been set to 2 based on the presence of this label: hotspot-compiler. This can be overridden with the /reviewers command.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 23, 2026
@mlbridge

mlbridge Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Webrevs

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kuaiwei Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 27, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kuaiwei hotspot has been added to this pull request based on files touched in new commit(s).

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kuaiwei Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant