Skip to content

Conversation

naotoj
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj commented Sep 2, 2025

Adding a @throws clause for NPE in java.text.DateFormatSymbols(Locale) constructor. The bug suggests it should throw a MissingResourceException, but I don't think we can change this long standing behavior. Instead, explicitly specify the NPE in the javadoc.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8366735 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8366517: Refine null locale processing of ctor/factory methods in Date/DecimalFormatSymbols (Bug - P4)
  • JDK-8366735: Refine null locale processing of ctor/factory methods in Date/DecimalFormatSymbols (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27060/head:pull/27060
$ git checkout pull/27060

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27060
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27060/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27060

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27060

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27060.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 2, 2025

👋 Welcome back naoto! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2025

@naotoj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8366517: Refine null locale processing of ctor/factory methods in `Date/DecimalFormatSymbols`

Reviewed-by: jlu, rriggs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 106 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Sep 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2025

@naotoj The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs [email protected] i18n [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 2, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me and the static factory methods already specify the NPE. fyi: PR title is missing the ` around code portions.

@naotoj naotoj changed the title 8366517: DateFormatSymbols(Locale) throws NPE if Locale argument is null 8366517: DateFormatSymbols(Locale) throws NPE if Locale argument is null Sep 2, 2025
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ public DateFormatSymbols()
* @throws java.util.MissingResourceException
* if the resources for the specified locale cannot be
* found or cannot be loaded.
* @throws NullPointerException if {@code locale} is null
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding an explicit Objects.requireNull(locale, "locale") would clearly identify when the NPE is thrown.
Though it might be earlier than without the check.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right. Added the explicit null check. (and a test case)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we are adding an explicit check to the ctor, might we also take this opportunity to add the check to the related 1-arg factory method?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed. Also did the same for DecimalFormatSymbols.

@RogerRiggs
Copy link
Contributor

Considerable scope creep here, the issue title and PR title should be updated. And the CSR.

@naotoj naotoj changed the title 8366517: DateFormatSymbols(Locale) throws NPE if Locale argument is null 8366517: Refine null locale processing of ctor/factory methods in Date/DecimalFormatSymbols Sep 3, 2025
@naotoj
Copy link
Member Author

naotoj commented Sep 3, 2025

Considerable scope creep here, the issue title and PR title should be updated. And the CSR.

Modified

Copy link
Contributor

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Sep 5, 2025
@naotoj
Copy link
Member Author

naotoj commented Sep 5, 2025

Thanks for the reviews!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Going to push as commit 3824c7c.
Since your change was applied there have been 108 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 5, 2025

@naotoj Pushed as commit 3824c7c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants